Which of the following describes a defectively executed deed where the grantee has equitable title?

The concept of a defectively executed deed can lead to the notion of equitable title effectively being conveyed, even though the deed itself may not meet all legal requirements for a valid transfer of legal title. In this context, when we say that the grantee has equitable title, it indicates that they have a right to obtain or enforce the deed in the future, despite the defect.

Equitable title means that the party has a beneficial interest in the property, allowing them to benefit from or control the property in some way, although they may not hold the legal title due to issues like improper execution of the deed. Therefore, option B correctly reflects the intersection of legal and equitable title where, despite the defect in the deed, the grantee feels the effects of ownership and can assert certain rights connected to the property.

Understanding this issue is vital in real estate transactions because while a deed may be defectively executed and thus challenge the legal title transfer, the principles of equity often come into play to protect the interests of the parties involved. In practice, this means the courts might recognize and enforce the equitable title when awarding rights or benefits to the parties, even if the deed itself has flaws.

The other options do not directly address the relationship between the defectively executed